Maryland Child Support Guidelines Updates – No Support Order 2022

2022 will see 5 major changes to the child support guidelines, one of which will allow the Court to decline to award any child support if certain circumstances exist.  Child support law current through June 30, 2022 does not entitle a Court to decline to order child support.  These changes will be found in Family Law Article §12-202(b) and apply to cases filed on and after July 1, 2022*.

Circumstances under the new law allowing a no support order are:

  • The child lives with the parent from whom support is sought and the parent is contributing to the child’s expenses
  • The parent is unemployed, has no resources to pay child support, and is incarcerated and expected to remain so for the remaining time support would be paid (but also see 2020 updates about incarcerated obligors/payors)
  • The parent is institutionalized in a psychiatric care facility and expected to remain so for the remaining time support would be paid
  • The parent is totally and permanently disabled, unable to obtain or maintain employment, and has no income other than SSI or SSCI benefits (in which case, there is usually a dependent benefit paid for the child’s support)
  • The parent is unable to obtain or maintain employment in the foreseeable future due to criminal detainment, hospitalization or rehab

Interestingly, the new law also provides that a parent meeting or ceasing to meet the criteria above shall be a material change in circumstance to modify the child support award.  This recognizes that the qualifying circumstances above may not be permanent and support could be awarded in future.

However, the law doesn’t tell us how this material change language fits with Family Law Article §12-202(b), that changes to the child support guidelines law are not, themselves alone, a material change in circumstance to justify a modification of child support.  So, if the circumstances above exist on June 30, 2022, can a parent receive a termination or suspension of child support based upon the new law?  Hard to say for sure.  But if a parent does not make a request of the court, a parent won’t know.

Why did this come about?  Because Maryland is legally required to review its child support guidelines every 4 years and perhaps because research has shown that child support orders for too high an amount in fact result in less child support actually being paid.  So, by comparison, requiring payment of child support when a parent has no legally justifiable ability to pay may result in less child support being paid over the child’s lifetime.  Also, certain of the circumstances are in keeping with federal law.

What tips should parents and attorneys keep in mind?

  • Don’t forget Family Law Article §12-104.1 if the basis is incarceration.  Because these two statutes are different but both apply to incarcerated payors obligors.  Compare the two when incarceration is justification for a suspension or termination of support.  (See article about 2020 Updates Incarcerated Obligors/Payors)
  • Consider material change if requesting a modification after July 1, 2022*.  Per Maryland law, changes to the child support guidelines law are not, themselves alone, a material change in circumstance to justify a modification of child support (Maryland Code, Family Law Article §12-202(b)).  Other material changes are needed to obtain a modification of child support.  Make sure those changes exist and are stated in your Court filings.  And if not and helpful to your position, point that out to the Court.
  • Use the 2022 law changes as a reference point for the Court.  If a termination or suspension of child support is requested before July 1, 2022 based on circumstances that would allow a no support order under the new law, refer the Court to the new law if helpful to your position.
  • Don’t delay.  If these circumstances exist now, they may justify a modification, suspension, or termination of child support now.  Plus, modification can only be granted retroactive to the date a request is filed with the court*.

* Damon v. Robles, 245 Md.App. 233 (2020) provides an interesting and complicated discussion of when these exclusions may not apply.  Worth a look if interested in applying July 1, 2022 changes to cases filed or circumstances existing before that date.

For other articles in this series about updates to the child support guidelines law in 2020 and 2022:

Since 2002, Lindsay Parvis has represented clients in Maryland custody, divorce, and marital matters. She negotiates, litigates, and advocates for the best interests of her clients, whether in contested litigation, uncontested settlement, or premarital and other agreements. Her clients are not only spouses and parents, but also children whose interests she is appointed by the court to represent in contested custody litigation.  Lindsay strives to improve Maryland law in the General Assembly, volunteering her time to monitor, advocate, and educate about legislative developments in family law.

Lindsay Parvis

Client-focused legal representation starts with listening.  I listen to my clients’ needs, goals, and priorities.  From there, I educate my clients about the law and process to empower them with information and knowledge. This is especially important because my clients often feel unheard and powerless when facing a situation that feels out of control.

See more articles by category:

Sign up for Joseph Greenwald & Laake

Subscribe & Stay Informed

Your data are used to send our monthly newsletter. You can use the unsubscribe link integrated in the newsletter at any time. Learn more about our data collection and privacy policy.

Contact Us

no more than 250 characters

Or, you may direct your question directly to one of our Joseph Greenwald & Laake attorneys listed

no more than 250 characters

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


The JGL Law Blog is made available by the Firm and/or the law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law. The JGL Law Blog is not designed to and does not provide specific legal advice. Use of, or comments on, this Blog does not create an Attorney Client Relationship with the Firm or any of the authors of the Blog Posts.

This blog is for general informational purposes only. Joseph, Greenwald & Laake, PA is a law firm and some of the information on the blog relates to legal topics. Joseph, Greenwald & Laake, PA does not offer or dispense legal advice through this blog or by e-mails directed to or from this site. By using the blog, the reader agrees that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between the reader and Joseph, Greenwald & Laake, PA or its attorneys. The blog is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your state. The information on the blog may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. While the blog is revised on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed at or through the blog are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney. The JGL Law Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service in Circular 230, we inform you that any tax advice contained on this site (including any links provided) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication.