D.C.’s New Pre-Litigation Insurance Disclosure Law - Leveling the Playing Field will Help Personal Injury Plaintiffs Resolve Claims Faster

by Celeste Cunningham
August 23rd, 2013

 

The Pre-Litigation Discovery of Insurance Coverage Amendment Act of 2012 is now in effect in the District of Columbia and offers a new and powerful tool to Plaintiffs and their personal injury attorneys in settling claims for maximum value.

In January 2013, the Council for the District of Columbia amended the Compulsory/No-Fault Vehicle Insurance Act of 1982[1] to require pre-litigation disclosure of any insurance agreement under which certain persons may be liable to satisfy all or part of the claim or to indemnify or reimburse for payments made to satisfy the claim by insurance companies.  This was done in order to facilitate settlements and “reduce the amount of litigation” in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.[2]

Once the claimant has made a written claim for compensation or damages concerning a vehicle accident, the Act requires an insurer to disclose the amount of its insured’s applicable limits of coverage, regardless of whether the insurer contests the applicability of the policy to the claim.

The claimant must also provide the insurer with the following information:

(1)   The date of the vehicle accident;

(2)   The name and last known address of the alleged tortfeasor;

(3)   A copy of the vehicle accident report, if any;

(4)   The insurer's claim number, if available;

(5)   The claimant's health care bills and documentation of the claimant's loss of income, if any, resulting from the vehicle accident; and

(6)   The records of health care treatment for the claimant's injuries caused by the vehicle accident.[3]

Additional documentation is required if the claim is brought by the estate of an individual or a beneficiary of the individual, whose death resulted from a vehicle accident.

Unlike Maryland’s similar statute requiring insurers to disclose policy limits,[4] the District’s new law does not require the claimant to document health care bills and loss of income of at least $12,500.00 in order for the insurer to be required to make the disclosure. Importantly, the insurer is required by the new law to respond in writing within thirty (30) days of receipt of the request.


[1] D.C. Law 4/155; D.C. Official Code § 31-2401 et seq.

[2] Id.

[3] Id.

[4] Md. Cts & Jud. Pro. §10-1101-1105

Celeste A. Cunningham is the Senior Personal Injury Paralegal at Joseph, Greenwald & Laake, P.A. Celeste can be reached directly at CCunningham@JGLLAW.com or by calling 301-220-2200.

Contact

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

Disclaimer

The JGL Law Blog is made available by the Firm and/or the law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law. The JGL Law Blog is not designed to and does not provide specific legal advice. Use of, or comments on, this Blog does not create an Attorney Client Relationship with the Firm or any of the authors of the Blog Posts.

This blog is for general informational purposes only. Joseph, Greenwald & Laake, PA is a law firm and some of the information on the blog relates to legal topics. Joseph, Greenwald & Laake, PA does not offer or dispense legal advice through this blog or by e-mails directed to or from this site. By using the blog, the reader agrees that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between the reader and Joseph, Greenwald & Laake, PA or its attorneys. The blog is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your state. The information on the blog may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. While the blog is revised on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed at or through the blog are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney. The JGL Law Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service in Circular 230, we inform you that any tax advice contained on this site (including any links provided) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication.

˅