Maryland Expands Anti-Discrimination Law

ByJay Holland in Labor & Employement October 1st, 2019

Maryland Expands Anti-Discrimination Law To Include Independent Contractors, And Expand Rights of Harassment Victims

The Maryland Human Relations Act (the “Maryland HRA”), is generally broader and procedurally distinct from its federal counterpart, commonly referred to as Title VII. Maryland has now amended its law in some very significant respects.

Independent Contractors

Title VII provides protection against discrimination and harassment in employment based on protected characteristics, like race and gender. However, Title VII does not cover independent contractors. So, under federal law, if an independent contractor is a victim of discrimination or sexual harassment in their workplace, there is no remedy under Title VII. With a higher percentage of workers employed in the “gig economy” as independent contractors, this leaves a gaping chasm in worker protection.

The amendments to the Maryland HRA (effective October 1, 2019) seek to address this.  Previously – and consistent with federal law – the Act applied only to employees, and contained no protection for independent contractors.  The definition of “employee” has now been expanded to now include “independent contractors” as follows:

Sec. 20-601(c)(1):  “Employee” means:

(I)    An individual employed by an employer; OR


Going forward, independent contractors seeking redress for workplace discrimination in Maryland now should consider pursuing the claim under Maryland State law.


Federal law has long recognized “harassment” based on a protected classification, such as sex, to be a form of discrimination banned by Title VII.  However, protection for workplace harassment is a judicial – not statutory - construct, recognized by the Supreme Court since 1986, in Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson , 477 U.S. 57 (1986).  

The Maryland HRA has been amended to incorporate a statutory definition of harassment:

“Sec. 20-601(H):  “Harassment includes harassment based on race, color, religion, ancestry, or national origin, sex, age, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability, and retains its judicially determined meaning, except to the extent it is expressly or impliedly changed in this subtitle.”

The Maryland HRA generally applies to “larger” employers with at least 15 employees for each working day in each of 20 or more calendar weeks in the current or proceeding calendar year.  In that regard, the Act mirrored Title VII. Now, with respect to harassment claims, the Act has been expanded to apply to employers that have “one or more employees for each working day in each of 20 or more calendar weeks in the current or preceding calendar year.

The new law covers all employers in the state and is a dramatic expansion of the Maryland HRA anti-harassment provisions.

The new harassment provisions include a broad scope of conduct for which an employer may be held liable. This is a dramatic pivot in the law; and could well result in per se liability for employers. 

            “Sec. 20-611: In an action alleging a violation of this Subtitle based on Harassment, an Employer is liable:

(1)  For the acts or omissions toward an Employee or applicant for employment, committed by an Individual who:

(I)           undertakes or recommends tangible employment actions affecting the employee or an applicant for employment, including hiring, firing, promoting, demoting, and reassigning the employee or an applicant for employment; or

(II)          directs, supervises, or evaluates the work activities of the Employee;  or

(2)  If the negligence of the Employer led to the Harassment or continuation of Harassment.

This appears to be a far more relaxed standard for employees to satisfy than under federal law.

Finally, the new amendments under the Maryland HRA have significantly enlarged the filing deadlines and statute of limitations for claims of harassment:

·         For harassment claims, complainants now have 2 years from the date on which the alleged harassment occurred to file an administrative complaint with the Maryland Commission on Civil Rights (increased from 6 months).  Sec. 20-1004(c)(2).

Filing with a local human relations commission within 2 years of the alleged harassment satisfies this filing deadline. Id.  (The Maryland HRA continues to require filing with an administrative agency prior to filing a lawsuit in state or federal court.)  

·         For harassment claims only, the limitations period for filing a civil case in court has now been increased to 3 years from the date of the unlawful employment practice (previously 2 years).

These changes reflect a policy direction that sends a message to employers that engaging in or acquiescing to harassment in the workplace will not be tolerated. Accordingly, employers would be wise to enact stringent and enforced anti-harassment policies. A nod toward enforcement will not be enough.

Jay Holland

Proudly displayed in Jay Holland’s office is a plaque that reads: “The Best Lawyer a Client Could Ever Have.” The customized award was a gift from a client at the end of a seven-and-a-half–year legal battle. The success wasn’t just winning the case in court; it was also serving as a loyal ally, protector, and advocate for the client throughout his long journey to achieve justice.

See more articles by category:

Sign up for Joseph Greenwald & Laake

Subscribe & Stay Informed

Your data are used to send our monthly newsletter. You can use the unsubscribe link integrated in the newsletter at any time. Learn more about our data collection and privacy policy.

Contact Us

no more than 250 characters

Or, you may direct your question directly to one of our Joseph Greenwald & Laake attorneys listed

no more than 250 characters

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.