Is Your Prenuptial Agreement Worth the Paper it's Printed on?

by Eleanor A. Hunt
July 26th, 2018

Prenuptial agreements are an important vehicle for protecting and preserving wealth and assets acquired prior to and during marriage, as well as for pre-determining what assets and payments you and your soon-to-be-spouse will be entitled to upon the unfortunate occasion of a divorce.  However, not all prenuptial agreements are worth the paper their printed on.  When a party to a divorce requests that a Maryland Circuit Court determine the validity of their prenuptial agreement, the courts do not always uphold these agreements as valid.  The reasons they are deemed invalid range from overreaching to various contractual defenses such as fraud, duress or even coercion.  If you are considering having a prenuptial agreement prepared in Maryland, then there are several factors that should be taken into consideration in order to protect it from being declared invalid by a Maryland court.  Although not an exhaustive list, the following should be at the forefront of your mind:

  1. You and Your Soon-to-be Spouse Should Hire Your Own Separate, Independent Attorneys

While there are numerous tools available on the internet that enable the quick, easy and inexpensive purchase of a template for the preparation of a prenuptial agreement, a template is a far cry from having a knowledgeable attorney prepare, negotiate and finalize the agreement on your behalf.   A knowledgeable attorney should provide sound advice regarding the necessary contents of the agreement, explain the importance of each and every provision in the agreement and the procedure and timing in which it should be executed by the parties.  If the goal is to preserve and protect wealth and assets, then the investment of hiring an attorney to draft the agreement on your behalf is well-worth the price.

Although not a prerequisite to its validity, not only should the initial drafter of the agreement hire their own attorney, but it is highly important that each party to the prenuptial agreement retain their own separate independent attorney in the drafting and negotiation of the agreement.  That means that both you and your soon-to-be spouse should hire two separate attorneys.  In addition, the agreement should contain a reference to name of each party’s attorney and, if one party decides not to retain an attorney, then the agreement should contain language to the effect that the party was provided ample opportunity to do so and decided not to.

If each party retains their own attorney during the process of drafting and negotiating the terms of the prenuptial agreement, then it will be less likely that one of the parties will be successful in attacking the prenuptial agreement on the contractual defenses of fraud, duress, coercion, mistake, undue influence, incompetence, or even unconscionability.  Each party’s attorney should be looking out for their client’s own best interests, which should also help to prevent any future arguments as to inequity or unfairness in the procurement of the agreement.

  1. Financial Disclosures by Each Party Are a Must

The prenuptial agreement should also include a comprehensive financial disclosure by each party, which should contain a reference to an exhaustive list of each parties’ pre-marital real and personal property, and the property’s respective values.  If a party is waiving an interest in the other party’s pre-marital assets, then the Maryland case law is clear that the party waiving their interest must have knowledge of what they are actually waiving. The financial disclosure should confirm exactly what each party owns at the time of the execution of the prenuptial agreement.  Although the lack of a financial disclosure by each party is not always a winning argument when attempting to attack the validity of the prenuptial agreement, it is one of the arguments that carries substantial weight.  The financial disclosures are typically attached to the back of the prenuptial agreement as exhibits and it is easy to overlook attaching the exhibits to the final draft of the agreement.  If each party retains their own attorney then it will be less likely that an important detail such as this will be overlooked.

The Maryland case law states that the "real test in a determination of the validity of an . . . [prenuptial] agreement is whether there was overreaching, that is, whether in the atmosphere and environment of the confidential relationship there was unfairness or inequity in the result of the agreement or in its procurement" and it is the proponent of the agreement’s burden to prove this.  Stewart v. Stewart, 214 Md. App. 458, 462 (2013).  There are several ways to prove this.  For instance, if the prenuptial agreement contains a “full, frank, and truthful disclosure, of the worth of the property, real and personal, as to which there is a waiver of rights in whole or in part, so that he or she who waives can know what it is he or she is waiving.  Indeed, if that standard is met, the agreement may well be rendered resistant to attack.” Id.

If the financial disclosure contained in the prenuptial agreement does not meet the high standard of proof necessary to establish that there had been no overreaching in the creation of the agreement, then there are alternate standards that the proponent of the agreement must meet in order to prove the validity of the agreement.  Id.  If an inadequate disclosure and an unfairly disproportionate allocation existed, then the alternate standards that the proponent of the agreement must meet are: (1) whether the benefit to the waiving party was commensurate with what he or she relinquished such that the agreement was fair and equitable; and (2) whether the party attacking the agreement entered into the agreement freely and understandingly. Id.

Since the adequacy of the financial disclosure is a key party of the prenuptial agreement, it is better to be safe than sorry when preparing it!

  1. Time is of the Essence

When considering whether to retain an attorney to prepare a prenuptial agreement, time is of the essence! Maryland case law is replete with examples of prenuptial agreements that were declared invalid and one of the recurring reasons for the invalidity, along with the lack of an adequate financial disclosure, is that the agreement was presented by the preparer of the agreement to the other party at the eleventh hour. If the prenuptial agreement is presented to the soon-to-be spouse a day or two, or even a few hours, prior to the parties’ marriage ceremony, the agreement could be vulnerable to attack.  It would be all too easy for the party who was unexpectedly presented with the prenuptial agreement to argue that they were coerced into entering into it because they felt they had no choice since the wedding was to take place the next day or in a few hours.  In addition, that same party could easily argue that they had no time to hire an attorney due to the last minute presentation of the proposal.  Those statements certainly do not bode well when combined with an agreement that is lacking a comprehensive financial disclosure.

 

 

 

When her clients are involved in thorny family law matters, Eleanor Hunt is ready and willing to go into battle. An experienced courtroom advocate, Eleanor takes pride in those cases where JGL’s team wins trial victories in difficult cases. But she also realizes that the best result for many clients is a fair settlement that resolves the case without the time and risk inherent in going to trial.

Contact Eleanor Hunt

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

Disclaimer

The JGL Law Blog is made available by the Firm and/or the law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law. The JGL Law Blog is not designed to and does not provide specific legal advice. Use of, or comments on, this Blog does not create an Attorney Client Relationship with the Firm or any of the authors of the Blog Posts.

This blog is for general informational purposes only. Joseph, Greenwald & Laake, PA is a law firm and some of the information on the blog relates to legal topics. Joseph, Greenwald & Laake, PA does not offer or dispense legal advice through this blog or by e-mails directed to or from this site. By using the blog, the reader agrees that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between the reader and Joseph, Greenwald & Laake, PA or its attorneys. The blog is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your state. The information on the blog may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. While the blog is revised on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed at or through the blog are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney. The JGL Law Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service in Circular 230, we inform you that any tax advice contained on this site (including any links provided) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication.

˅