Administrative Subpoenas in Maryland

by Matthew M. Bryant
November 14th, 2014

Have you received a subpoena from an administrative agency that is seeking documents or an interview with you? What next?

A subpoena is simply an order from a court or government agency. This post deals with subpoenas issued by government or administrative agencies. Most licensed professionals (think doctors, psychologists, dentists, and social workers) are regulated by agencies with subpoena powers. Typically, a subpoena seeks to compel a person’s attendance at a hearing or produce documents that a government agency is seeking as part of an investigation. A subpoena may seek privileged information or testimony potentially implicating the Fifth Amendment right against self incrimination.

If you receive a subpoena from a government agency, do not ignore it. There is a misperception that licensed professionals can ignore the administrative subpoena if it seeks privileged or confidential documents. This is not correct.

Maryland law is clear: If you are served with an administrative subpoena, you must respond by producing the requested information or challenge the subpoena in court by filing a timely motion to quash or request a protective order.

There is great risk if you fail to respond or challenge the subpoena in court. Individuals who refuse to respond risk being professionally disciplined with obstructing or failing to cooperate with an investigation, which can have serious consequences for a professional’s license. For example, in Md. State Bd. of Physicians v. Eist, 417 Md. 545 (2011), the Board of Physicians issued a subpoena to a psychiatrist for privileged records related to his treatment of a patient. Even though the patient refused to consent to the disclosure of the privileged records, the Board charged and ultimately found that the psychiatrist failed “to cooperate with a lawful investigation conducted by the Board.” Id. at 552. Most regulated professions have similar requirements.

The psychiatrist eventually turned the records over and the Board dismissed the underlying complaint, but pursued the disciplinary charge related to obstructing the Board’s investigation. In determining that the Board of Physicians correctly found that the psychiatrist failed to cooperate with an investigation, the Court of Appeals explained that “when the Board is investigating a complaint against a health care provider and subpoenas certain medical records in his or her possession, the health care provider is required to provide the medical records to the Board regardless of the patient's authorization.” Id. at 564. The Court of Appeals’ decision illustrates the broad authority licensing agencies possess. See Dr. K. v. State Bd. of Physician Quality Assurance, 98 Md. App. 103, 120 (1993) (“To give a patient, in effect, a veto over the Board's power to regulate licensed physicians would be to eviscerate the Board's ability to protect the larger public interest.”).

If you receive an administrative subpoena, it is imperative to comply with the subpoena or challenge the subpoena in court. Do not ignore it.

Matthew M. Bryant is a senior counsel in the firm’s Civil Litigation practice group. He is an experienced trial and appellate attorney representing businesses and individuals in state and federal court. Matthew represents clients in litigation in the following practice areas: 

• Appellate representation in both civil and criminal cases; 

• Employment law including wage and hour litigation (i.e., claims that employees were not properly paid), employment discrimination (i.e., discrimination based on gender, race, disability, etc.), and disputes over non-compete agreements;

Contact Matthew Bryant

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


The JGL Law Blog is made available by the Firm and/or the law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law. The JGL Law Blog is not designed to and does not provide specific legal advice. Use of, or comments on, this Blog does not create an Attorney Client Relationship with the Firm or any of the authors of the Blog Posts.

This blog is for general informational purposes only. Joseph, Greenwald & Laake, PA is a law firm and some of the information on the blog relates to legal topics. Joseph, Greenwald & Laake, PA does not offer or dispense legal advice through this blog or by e-mails directed to or from this site. By using the blog, the reader agrees that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between the reader and Joseph, Greenwald & Laake, PA or its attorneys. The blog is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your state. The information on the blog may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. While the blog is revised on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed at or through the blog are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney. The JGL Law Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service in Circular 230, we inform you that any tax advice contained on this site (including any links provided) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication.