One of the most common sources of confusion for people facing marital conflict in Maryland is the legal terminology. Terms like separation, divorce, litigation, mediation, and settlement are used interchangeably, yet each has a distinct legal meaning and very different consequences. Understanding these differences is essential before making decisions that affect your finances, your children, and your legal rights.

This article explains how these and other terms work in Maryland family law and how they often intersect in your case.

1. What “Separation” Means in Maryland

Unlike some states, Maryland does not have a formal legal status called “legal separation.” In Maryland, separation simply means that spouses are living “separate and apart”, with the intent that the marital relationship has ended. Separation can occur:

  • In different residences, or,
  • In the same home, if the spouses live independently (often referred to as “separation under the same roof”).

Separation is legally significant because it may:

  • Serve as a prerequisite for certain divorce grounds,
  • Impact custody and child support arrangements,
  • Suggest a date for the division of property in the context of a settlement.

However, separation alone does not end the marriage, divide property, or create enforceable financial obligations unless a court order or agreement exists.

2. Divorce: Absolute vs. Limited Divorce

Maryland only recognizes one type of divorce, an Absolute Divorce. An absolute divorce permanently dissolves the marriage. Once granted, spouses are legally single and free to remarry.

An absolute divorce judgment may address:

Most people seeking a divorce ultimately pursue an absolute divorce, even if they begin with separation or negotiations.

Prior to the State of Maryland’s legislative change to the grounds for divorce, a limited divorce existed as a “legal separation” whereby temporary orders could be entered to deal with custody, financial support, or use and possession of the family home. Now, limited divorce is no longer a feature of Maryland law.

3. Agreements: Separation Agreements and Settlement Agreements

Many Maryland divorce cases are resolved through written agreements, rather than a contested trial. A separation or marital settlement agreement is a contract between spouses that may address:

  • Property division,
  • Support obligations,
  • Custody and parenting schedules,
  • Responsibility for expenses,
  • Future dispute resolution.

These agreements can be:

  • Executed before a divorce is filed,
  • Incorporated into a divorce judgment,
  • Enforced as contracts or court orders.

Agreements offer several advantages:

  • Greater control over outcomes,
  • Reduced cost and emotional strain,
  • Privacy (as opposed to public court proceedings).

However, poorly drafted agreements can create long-term problems. Once incorporated into a judgment, modifying them can be difficult.

4. Litigation: When the Court Decides

Litigation occurs when spouses cannot reach an agreement and ask the court to decide contested issues. Litigated cases will often include all issues arising out of the marriage. Litigation occurs when one of the spouses files a Complaint for Absolute Divorce with the Court in the county in which you reside. The Complaint may ask the Court for any number of points of relief, including:

  • Custody and parenting time,
  • Child support or alimony,
  • Valuation and division of assets,
  • A monetary award,
  • Attorneys’ fees.

Because litigation is the formal process of contesting your divorce in the Court, the process includes the common aspects of the court process, such as:

  • Pleadings and motions,
  • Discovery (financial disclosures, subpoenas, depositions),
  • Hearings and trial,
  • Judicial rulings based on evidence and testimony.

While litigation is sometimes necessary, particularly in high-conflict or high-asset cases, it is often more expensive, time-consuming, and unpredictable than negotiated resolutions.

Notably, when a case enters the phase of litigation, this does not prevent people from deciding to settle their case and avoid the continuation of litigation. In fact, a settlement of a case remains possible until the proverbial gavel is dropped by the presiding Judge during a final trial in a case.

5. How These Concepts Work Together in Real Cases

In practice, most Maryland family law cases involve acombination of these elements:

  • A couple separates,
  • Negotiates some issues by agreement,
  • Litigates the left over/most contentious issues,
  • Ultimately obtains an absolute divorce.

There is no single “right” path. The appropriate approach depends on:

  • The level of conflict,
  • Financial complexity,
  • Safety concerns,
  • Whether children are involved,
  • Each party’s willingness to negotiate in good faith.

It is critically important not compare your case to a family or friend’s prior case. While divorce cases can often follow a similar path, each family’s unique set of facts and emotions makes each and every case distinct.

6. Why Legal Guidance Matters Early

Misunderstanding these family law terms can lead to costly mistakes, such as assuming separation alone provides legal protection or signing an agreement without understanding its long-term implications. Speaking with a Maryland family law attorney early can help you:

  • Understand your options,
  • Choose the right process for your situation,
  • Avoid unnecessary litigation,
  • Protect your financial and parental rights.

Final Thoughts

Separation, divorce, agreements, and litigation are tools, not outcomes. Knowing how they differ and how they interact allows you to make informed and strategic decisions during what will inevitably prove to be one of the most difficult periods of time in your life. If you are considering separation or divorce, a consultation can help clarify next steps and put you on a path that aligns with your goals.

Super Lawyers has named 13 attorneys from JGL’s Maryland offices to its 2026 Maryland Super Lawyers and Rising Stars lists. In addition, Lindsay Parvis was named to the Top 100 Super Lawyers list in Maryland and the Top 50 Women Super Lawyers list in Maryland.

Super Lawyers, part of Thomson Reuters, is a rating service of outstanding lawyers in over 70 practice areas, who have achieved a high degree of professional achievement and peer recognition. The annual selection process combines independent research, peer nominations and evaluations, with no more than five percent of each state’s attorneys named to the Super Lawyers list and no more than 2.5 percent named to the Rising Stars list.

The following attorneys were named to the 2026 Super Lawyers list:

Greenbelt, MD

  • Andy Greenwald – Medical Malpractice
  • Jay P. Holland – Employment & Labor
  • Timothy F. Maloney – General Litigation
  • Steven M. Pavsner – Personal Injury – Medical Malpractice: Plaintiff

Rockville, MD

  • David M. Bulitt – Family Law
  • Jeffrey N. Greenblatt – Family Law
  • Lindsay Parvis – Family Law

The following attorneys were named to the 2026 Super Lawyers Rising Stars list:

Rising Stars

  • Bridget Cardinale – Civil Litigation: Plaintiff
  • Christopher R. Castellano – Family Law
  • Virginia B. Grimm – Civil Litigation: Plaintiff
  • Kaitlin Leary – Employment & Labor
  • Alyse Prawde – Civil Litigation: Plaintiff

David Bulitt has been named “Best Family Attorney” by Potomac Lifestyle. Chosen by the publication’s readers, The Best Businesses in Potomac 2026 list celebrates the area’s businesses, people and places.

A family lawyer since 1986, David brings deep experience to clients navigating complex and emotionally challenging matters. He is consistently listed among Maryland’s top family law attorneys, has co-authored two award-winning relationship books, is a frequent media contributor and a podcast host.

Since the Trump administration increased immigration enforcement, both noncitizens and U.S. citizens have faced greater risks of detention. While being in the U.S. unlawfully is a civil offense, the consequences of enforcement are real and immediate.

In Maryland, that risk has become more visible in recent months. Kilmar Armando Ábrego García, a Maryland resident, was wrongfully deported to El Salvador and later detained again by ICE after returning to the U.S. A few months later, video footage from Hyattsville, Maryland went viral, showing Job Arias-Mendoza being arrested by ICE in the middle of an intersection and an officer appearing to point his gun toward bystanders. These headlines have raised community concerns about law enforcement’s use of force and the role of immigration agents in local policing.

Across Maryland, law enforcement agencies are taking varied approaches to ICE. In October 2025, Baltimore County signed an agreement with ICE, consenting to notify them when individuals in local custody are about to be released. Meanwhile, Wicomico County recently paused its plan to adopt an agreement that would authorize local law enforcement offices to act as ICE agents. This pause came after Maryland Attorney General Anthony Brown issued a guidance clarifying that local law enforcement cannot conduct “civil immigration enforcement.” The guidance specifies that Maryland officers may not ask for a suspect’s immigration status or extend a suspect’s detention to determine their status; must identify themselves by name and badge number and cite a reason when making a stop; and must adhere to state use of force standards, among other rules.

According to the immigrant rights group CASA, Maryland law enforcement agencies have transferred 119 immigrants from local jails into ICE custody in 2025 alone. ICE arrests are growing more aggressive and divisive throughout the U.S. With local law enforcement increasingly working alongside ICE, it’s important for residents, both citizens and non-citizens, to understand their legal rights.

Know Your Rights: If You Are Detained by Local Authorities or ICE

  1. Create a Safety Plan
    • Identify your emergency contacts and memorize their phone numbers.
    • Provide your child’s school or day care with an emergency contact.
    • Share your immigration number with trusted family or friends so they can locate you using ICE’s online detainee locator.
  2. Stay Calm
    • Do not run, argue, resist, or fight.
    • Keep your hands visible and notify officers before reaching for items.
    • Do not lie or provide false documents.
  3. Ask Questions
    • Confirm whether the officer is local police or ICE and request their badge number.
    • Ask if you are being arrested or detained, and if not, whether you may leave.
    • Request to see any warrant or documentation justifying your detention.
  4. Exercise Your Rights: All persons in the United States have constitutional protections, not just U.S. citizens.
    • Right to Remain Silent: You do not have to answer questions about your immigrant status, birthplace, or citizenship. Only provide your name, and if in a vehicle, license, registration, and proof of insurance. Passengers may refuse to provide ID.
    • Right to Refuse Searches: Officers need your consent or probable cause to search you or your belongings. Police may conduct a limited pat-down without your consent, if they suspect a weapon.
    • At Your Door: Keep your door closed. You do not need to let officers in unless they have a judicial warrant signed by a judge. Administrative or deportation warrants do not authorize entry without your consent.
    • Right to a Lawyer: Request legal counsel immediately. Do not sign documents without consulting a lawyer. If detained by ICE, you have the right to consult with a lawyer, but the government is not required to provide one for you.
    • If you are a non-citizen: You have the right to contact your consulate or have an officer inform the consulate of your detention.
    • If you are a U.S. citizen or have lawful immigration status: Show your passport, legal permanent resident card, work permit, or other documentation of your status. If you are over the age of 18, you should always carry your papers with you.
  5. Document Rights Violations
    • Write down everything: time, place, people involved (names and badge numbers), agencies, what was said, etc.
    • Photograph any injuries and seek medical care immediately.
    • Notify your attorney and consider filing a formal complaint.

Know Your Rights: If You Witness an ICE or Local Law Enforcement Arrest

  1. Stay Safe
    • Do not physically interfere.
    • Walk calmly and speak respectfully.
  2. Stay Observant
    • Record or photograph from a safe distance.
    • Capture identifying details: agent names, badge numbers, car make and model, etc.
    • If officers ask you to step back, do so but you can keep recording. You have a First Amendment right to record law enforcement actions in public spaces.
  3. Offer Support
    • You have a First Amendment right to talk to the person being detained. Verbally remind the detained person of their rights without obstructing officers.
    • Call their family or emergency contacts if possible.
  4. Keep Your Doors Closed
    • If officers come to your home or work looking for an individual, you do not have to let them in unless they have a judicial warrant signed by a judge. Administrative or deportation warrants do not authorize entry without your consent.
    • If officers insist on entering, do not physically interfere. Contact local police or security to address the situation.
  5. Report the Incident
    • Collect witness contact information and statements.
    • Share your recording or notes with civil rights or immigrant justice organizations.

At Joseph, Greenwald & Laake, we recognize the stress, fear, and uncertainty that can arise from encounters with law enforcement or ICE. We believe understanding your rights is the foundation of justice. If you suspect your rights were violated, we encourage you to reach out to a trusted civil rights attorney for representation.

Michal Shinnar has been selected by The National Trial Lawyers as one of its NTL – Civil Plaintiff – Top 100 Trial Lawyers in Maryland.

This honor is extended to a select group of attorneys who demonstrate outstanding qualifications, exceptional trial results, and leadership within civil plaintiff or criminal defense practice. Membership in The National Trial Lawyers (NTL) Top 100 is by invitation only and highlights the nation’s most accomplished trial lawyers.

Senior Counsel at JGL, Michal’s practice includes all aspects of employment law, including discrimination, disability accommodations, employment contracts, non-competes, severance agreements, and wage and hour disputes. She was a member of the litigation team that won the highly publicized $43.8 million settlement in Breen v. FAA, which made history as the highest settlement in an age discrimination case against the federal government. 

In an article published by The Legal Intelligencer on November 25, 2025, Drew LaFramboise discusses the risks and rights of workers involved in industrial fires and explosions.  

Regardless of their severity or type of injury, an employee who is unfortunately (and sometimes tragically) exposed to a fire or explosion at the workplace will have a host of immediate concerns, Drew explains, such as how their medical care will be covered, whether they’re financially responsible or at risk, and if they have any legal rights to pursue the responsible parties.

Drew writes that workers who are exposed to the risk of fire and explosion should know that in the event of an injury, they have a few core rights that will be central to their recovery and peace of mind. These include workers’ compensation benefits, third party liability, and freedom from discrimination or retaliation.

Suffering injury due to a fire or explosion on the job can be harrowing and life-altering Drew notes; however, injured workers are not without rights, and systems are in place to help workers recover their health, pursue justice and ensure that they can continue to move forward.

Read the full article “Workers’ Rights After an Industrial Fire or Explosion.” (PDF)

The holidays are supposed to be magical, but for separated or divorced parents, they can also be a minefield of schedules, expectations, and hurt feelings. In this episode of JGL LAW FOR YOU, family law attorneys and JGL principals David Bulitt and Christopher Castellano discuss how to navigate Thanksgiving, winter break, Christmas, and spring break in a way that keeps the focus where it belongs: on your kids.

David and Christopher dig into the real friction points they see every year in their practice: last-minute schedule changes, split holidays, travel plans, gift-giving “arms races,” and the challenges of two households with very different resources and traditions. They offer practical strategies for communicating with your co-parent, honoring old traditions while creating new ones, managing expectations with your children, and staying flexible when life (or the school calendar) doesn’t cooperate.

Whether you’re in the middle of a divorce, recently separated, or years into co-parenting, this conversation will help you plan ahead, reduce conflict, and build holiday memories your children will want to remember.

David Bulitt: [00:00:00] Welcome to JGL Law for You. JGL Law for You is a podcast by
lawyers, but not for lawyers. Only on JGL Law for You will we discuss a wide array of
topics to help you navigate the many legal processes, developments in the law, other
current events, and how they may affect you, your family, or your business.

We’re back on JGL Law for You, and joining me again is my good friend and law
partner, Chris Castellano. Chris has been practicing law for over a decade and is now
my partner here, Joseph Greenwall, and Laake. Today, we’re here to talk about
something that is particularly topical this time of year, and that is how to manage the
holidays if you’re separated, divorced, or in the midst of either.

So there’s a lot of stress that arises this time of year. This is when folks that do the work
that Chris and I do like to stick our heads in the sand and pretend that we’re in The
Bahamas somewhere, but that generally doesn’t happen. So Chris, let’s start from the
top down. [00:01:00]

We want to talk about how to keep the holidays peaceful while also making them
memorable for our families and for our children. How are you doing today?

Chris Castellano: I’m doing well. Thanks for having me back here, David, as always.
This topic, especially during this time, is so critical, and it’s so easy to lose sight of it
when people are struggling with their spouse, ex-spouse-to-be, or their ex.

It’s a difficult time because the holidays heighten those emotions. But as you rightfully
point out, it’s about focusing on the kids and allowing them to create the memories that
they need for their childhood.

David Bulitt: I also want to talk more about this later, because, as we discussed earlier,
it’s also trying to maintain family traditions, right?

At the same time, when you have two households, that can also be difficult, right?

Chris Castellano: Yeah, absolutely. Traditions, at their core, are about creating those
memories for the kids, right? For that [00:02:00] next generation. So that generations to
come still have that tie back to family, to culture, etc.

When we look at that, it’s important that, at its core, it’s stability. It’s allowing the kids to
enjoy that level of stability. If parents stray too far away from the focus of stability, what
you end up doing is hurting the kids in the long run. So consistent with the idea of what’s
in the best interest of those children, how do we maintain stability?

How do we maintain traditions? How do we maintain the ability for these kids to create
these memories during the holidays?

David Bulitt: Okay, so that dovetails into talking about specifics in terms of the hot-
button areas where the holidays can be challenging and stressful for parents and
families.

Chris Castellano: Yeah. Let’s start with families that have not yet entered into an
agreement.

I think that’s fair, right? We are in the midst of things. Maybe the [00:03:00] family — one
spouse or the other — filed a domestic violence petition in October, or a divorce petition
is pending, and we don’t have any immediate resolution. The first step is to go ahead
and identify the holidays that we’re talking about and who values them, quote-unquote,
more highly than the other parent.

I think that’s important because it allows that parent, the one who values it a little bit
higher — perhaps Thanksgiving, Christmas, what have you — to be the one that’s
ingrained in those traditions with the kids. The most important part of that, of course,
when you’re talking about the nuts and bolts, is communication. Because, again, we
don’t have an agreement in place.

So it’s about communicating clearly about the kids in a simple way. Perhaps this has
been the schedule that we’ve been abiding by informally. It’s going to require a bit of
[00:04:00] flexibility, a bit of a change, but this is what we think is in the best interest of
the kids. That communication shouldn’t come at the last minute.

Ideally, it should come about three days before a holiday, at a minimum.

David Bulitt: Or even before, right? Ideally, it’s well in advance. Three days sounds
good, but by that time, somebody could already be on a plane coming to visit, one
person’s buying a turkey, and the other thinks they’re taking the kids out to a restaurant
for dinner or something like that.

Chris Castellano: Well, that’s right. When we talk about this, don’t wait till the last
minute. Do it as soon as you can. Communicate as soon as you can. If it comes down
to it, I don’t want you communicating the day before. As David says, I want you at the
very latest three to four [00:05:00] days, but let’s communicate weeks in advance.

David Bulitt: So there’s a lot of stress in terms of scheduling. People are going to have
disagreements, particularly if there’s not something in writing. But assuming they get to
that point where they figure things out, is it important to — and I know this might be age-
specific — let the kids know, here’s what we’re doing?

We’ve talked about how we’re going to handle things. You’re going to do this for
Thanksgiving Day or the first half of the weekend, and you’re going to do this for the
other half of the weekend, something along those lines. Isn’t it important to
communicate that to the children as well?

Chris Castellano: Oh yeah, absolutely. Establishing what the calendar is going to be and
look like for the kids allows them to be able to anticipate what they’re going to be looking
forward to. You don’t want to catch them off guard and surprised as well.

They have expectations. David, you and I have done these cases. You’ve done it for
longer than I have, and I think that what I’ve recognized — and I’m sure you have as
well — is that the parents, they recognize the [00:06:00] importance of traditions,
values, etc., for the kids. But I think that what goes unrecognized and unidentified is the
kids’ expectations.

A kid’s going to look at Thanksgiving. What are they looking at? They’re thinking, “I want
to sit at nine o’clock and watch the parade. I want to be able to smell stuffing cooking in
the kitchen.” What they don’t want to be doing is driving two and a half hours at 10
o’clock in the morning down to mom’s grandparents’ house, right?

So, it’s important to establish for the kids what they can expect so that they’re not
disappointed. Because I tell you, the moment they get disappointed, their minds aren’t
fully developed. So, they’re going to start lashing out in ways that you don’t anticipate.

David Bulitt: So, let’s talk about — since it’s the closest — Thanksgiving specifically.
This is not a 10-day, 12-day, or two-week break from school. This is a long weekend,
essentially Wednesday to [00:07:00] Sunday for many, and some kids in private school
actually do have a week, the full week off. But let’s talk about Thanksgiving specifically
and what, if any, particular issues this presents to parents and their children.

Chris Castellano: Yeah, so Thanksgiving, thankfully, it’s a secular holiday. So, we can
set aside that complication. But it’s a middle-of-the-day holiday, right? What I mean by
that is, typically speaking, the meal is going to happen at around — well, I don’t know
about you, David — but typically it’s like a one- to three-o’clock meal, right?

It’s one of those wonderful holidays that doesn’t really make sense as far as the timing
is concerned. What that does is introduce the complication of what are we doing with
the holiday? Where are the kids going to be? So what the lawyers like to do in a lot of
agreements is, perhaps, both parties value Thanksgiving heavily. In that case, they say,
“Listen, I’m going to get the first half of the day, [00:08:00] and then at two o’clock the
kid’s going to transition over to the other parent for the second half and maybe part of
Black Friday.”

Ideally, that could work, but you have to balance that against a lot of other expectations
of other guests. For me personally, I’m going to a house with 20 chairs being seated,
right? So, you can’t exactly tell them, “Hey guys, I know you want the turkey now and
the stuffing while it’s hot, but you’ve got to wait until I can get my ex-wife to bring the kid
over,” right? That starts to get complicated.

So again, communication is key. You got to establish that expectation with the kid,
establish it with your spouse, your ex-spouse, what have you, and really identify it. But
of course, the simpler approach, which a lot of our agreements also have, is you’re
alternating the years. Some people have Thanksgiving on an odd year. Some have it on
an even year. So, if you have that established agreement, [00:09:00] read the
agreement. Read it well in advance of Thanksgiving.

I can’t tell you how many times, David, I’ve had people call me up, and I say, “Well,
when’s the last time you opened up that PDF? When’s the last time we read that
agreement?” Then they think, “Oh geez, Chris, well actually this is an odd year, so it’s
not my Thanksgiving.”

David Bulitt: After doing this for as long as I have — in December, it will be 39 years. I
don’t know why I keep bringing that up, but I’ll be starting my 40th year of doing this
work, which is maybe longer than some of the folks listening have been on the planet.
I’ve found that the two better options are what you’re talking about, which is not splitting
the day in half because that, in theory, does exactly what you just talked about, which is,
okay, they’re with me from the morning until two or three o’clock in the afternoon. Mom
or dad comes and picks them up, drives them down to Virginia, where the family’s
gathered.

So, they’re an hour in the car on Thanksgiving Day, which can be rough with traffic in
the DC area and certainly [00:10:00] other urban areas. Then you’re plopping these kids
in the car, taking them away, maybe from cousins or others, to go drop them someplace
else.

So my experience has been where people either alternate the entirety of the weekend,
which is Wednesday after school to Sunday evening, or they split it in half like you were
talking about, which is maybe Wednesday after school until Friday, so that way the
parent who doesn’t have Thanksgiving can do their Thanksgiving on Friday or on
Saturday.

At the end of the day, I don’t think the kids care that it’s Thanksgiving Day. I think that
most kids just want to be with their families. So if you’re having a second Thanksgiving,
right, don’t you think that’s a better approach than splitting the day in half?

Chris Castellano: A hundred percent. When you are in this situation in your life, flexibility
is key, and understanding what the net gain is to the kid, right? Are you going to have a
Thanksgiving Day parade on a Friday? No. No, you’re not. And it is what it is, [00:11:00]
right? But you’re likely to still have football on. You’re likely to still have a lot of those
traditional Thanksgiving items present. Then you can go and create your own mini
traditions on that Friday to make it feel like a unique day.

A lot of people put up their Christmas decorations the day after Thanksgiving. You can
build your second Thanksgiving around that concept if you’re splitting those holidays.
There are a bunch of different options.

David Bulitt: That’s a terrific idea. I hadn’t thought about that, but yeah, that’s a very
good idea. I think also what I’ve encouraged people to do if they’re in their off years —
so you either split the day or split the weekend — is to tell your family that you’re
celebrating Thanksgiving with the kids on Friday or Saturday this year, right?

A lot of times, families will adjust. You may only have the kids every other year, or only
for part of the holiday. People are worried, “Oh, well my brother won’t do that,” or “my
sister won’t do that,” because their family wants to do [00:12:00] it a certain way. But
oftentimes, I’ve had these discussions with folks over the last 39 years, and more often
than not, for anyone listening, families are willing to adjust.

Sometimes they can’t or they won’t, but oftentimes they are. And asking, right? Asking
is not a bad thing. That way, your kids get to do what you’re talking about, Chris.

Chris Castellano: Yeah, absolutely. Most people put aside their — I’ll be harsh and say
their selfish desires about how they want to see something happen — and they
recognize that the greater good is for the kids that are involved.

David Bulitt: This is a bigger discussion, not just Thanksgiving, and I want to get to that
winter break and Christmas in a second. But it requires an adult to think and act like an
adult.

Chris Castellano: That’s right.

David Bulitt: Which sometimes is not so easy. I mean, it’s not about our feelings, it’s
about 6-year-old Tommy’s feelings.

Let’s turn to the bigger break, the Christmas break, although there’s not necessarily the
religious aspect, although there may be spring break if Easter is important to folks. Let’s
talk about how to manage these longer breaks, where people might want to go on
vacations, whether — again, I think we should talk about spring break as well — there
might be less of a secular piece to it for many people.

Chris Castellano: Well, that’s right. Let’s just briefly talk about spring break because I
think that’s fair. A lot of people’s agreements do require establishing that by, let’s say,
January or even December 31st. So, I think it’s fair to talk about that now.

Spring break, I find, to be unique. Some public-school entities versus private school
entities certainly have a different view. If you’re in some of the northern states, you even
have other breaks. I don’t know if you’re aware of these — I’m sure you are — but the ski weeks, right, where you have off in February, early February. So, you start to have to
balance a lot of these different breaks.

But with spring break specifically, it could be less than a week. So again, that theme of
[00:14:00] flexibility is so necessary because you can’t anticipate if your spring break is
going to be curtailed due to snow days or what have you, in addition to the complication
of whether one party or both are religious and whether there’s certainly, as the kids start
to get older, a family expectation that the kids will be involved in religious activities, or
going to church, or what have you.

That allows us to dovetail back into winter break. I think the same requirement exists
there, right? First and foremost, that holiday break, regardless of what, at least for us in
Montgomery County, MCPS wants to call it, it’s going to start with Christmas, right? It’s
going to start with Christmas, and you’ve got Christmas Eve.

My first question to clients when figuring out this holiday schedule is, okay, what are we
doing as far as who values — I use that word lightly — who [00:15:00] values that
holiday first and primarily, right? Is one parent the one that’s going to take the kid to
church, for instance? Is that an important value to them? Who values putting the kid to
bed for Christmas Eve? Who values them having Christmas morning, whether it’s
opening presents Christmas morning, or brunch, breakfast, or whatever it may be, right?

Once you start to identify that, it allows us to go ahead and craft a scenario where, okay,
maybe we’re doing that thing where one party on even years gets Christmas Eve, the
next party gets Christmas Day. Or maybe we split Christmas Day at 12 o’clock.
Ironically enough, I find, at least in my own life, Christmas Day — well, I have young
kids, and so you know, you have nap times at around 12:30. And so all of a sudden,
Christmas Day for me in the last six years has gotten to 12 o’clock, and it’s just like a
ghost town.

David Bulitt: Do you take a nap too, Chris, or is it just the kids?

Chris Castellano: I need to start taking more naps at [00:16:00] 12 o’clock. So, it does
seem to be, at least for me — and I’m sure it’s the case for other people — that 12
o’clock can become somewhat of a quiet, natural transition time where you can then go
into a Christmas dinner at around the three- or four-o’clock time period.

So, kind of similar to Thanksgiving, although I do find that Christmas allows for a bit
more of a transition in the middle of the holiday, ironically enough. Then you look at the
rest of winter break. This is what gets so complicated. You look at this year, right? Our
calendar for this upcoming winter break in Montgomery County, Maryland, includes kids
going back to school January 5th.

When you do the whole division of, “Well, okay, this year they get all of — we’ll split up
Christmas — and then one party gets it during the even years and the odd years,” you
can’t do that because now you’re talking about the last couple days of the winter break
being in that [00:17:00] straddle between an even and an odd year, which is why I don’t
like to do that in my agreements.

I’ve experienced that too many times, so I don’t do that. It’s about identifying what the
days are and then going with the two holidays, Christmas and New Year’s, and then
dividing the days in between those two.

David Bulitt: And the lesser problem, before I get to specific issues, more specific issues
as to the Christmas slash winter break, are the families that may have one child who is
in private school for one reason or another, and the others are in public school, and
therefore the dates vary, right, for their particular breaks.

So that seems to me that that’s another place where people can bump heads and could
use some assistance from someone like you to try to navigate that, not only this year
but also in years down the road.

Chris Castellano: Yeah. It requires a lot of creativity. Creating an effective custody
calendar for people and families requires [00:18:00] creativity, rolling your sleeves up,
and getting into it because if you just take it as a, “Well, parent A gets even years,
parent B gets odd years, and then we’ll just split up the holidays and we’re done with it.
We’re not going to get into the minutiae.”

Well, except that the minutiae matters to people, right? And it matters to the kids. Again,
going back to what I said and how I opened it, those expectations that the kids may
have, that a lot of times get ignored — you need to get into it, and you need to have an
attorney, frankly, that’s willing to dive into those details and really start to understand
your family’s particularized needs.

David Bulitt: I think you just hit on a hot free tip. People pay us for this tip, but we’re
going to give it to them at no cost. That tip is: don’t get tied up in getting the deal struck.
It’s easier, as you said, to just say, “Okay, alternating holidays, odd years, even years.”
Stop and think, right?

Stop and think, what does that mean exactly for my family in 2025 or [00:19:00] 2026?
What does that mean for me? Look and take a moment. Because a lot of lawyers, as
well, are looking to try to get this thing signed, sealed, and delivered. And for many
lawyers — including some who don’t have children — I liken it to an oncologist who’s
never had cancer.

I’m not saying a doctor should have cancer, and I’m not saying that’s a good thing, but it
does give you an added understanding of what your patient is going through. Just like if

you have children or have had children and raised children, that gives you an added
understanding of what you have to think about in these types of deals. Don’t you think?

Chris Castellano: A hundred percent. I’m a firm believer that perspective is something
that is sorely lacking in virtually every area of our society right now. So, I think it’s most
certainly applicable in our field. Like I said five minutes ago, right? I’m sitting there on
the couch on Christmas Day at 12 o’clock because my kids are sleeping, they’re
napping, right?

You only really [00:20:00] understand what that’s like when you’ve experienced it. So,
you can offer that option to parents. And even though Halloween is behind us now,
when you talk about Halloween, you only understand its importance and what trick-or-
treating actually looks like with kids — and not just by hearkening back to your own
memory when you were a kid — if you have that perspective of kids.

That’s how you can understand how to divide these holidays properly.

David Bulitt: It’s interesting. I had a case where the lawyer on the other side did not
have children, and I made some remark, which was, of course, inappropriate. I tend to
make more of those as I’ve gotten older. I made some remark that Ms. Blank — we’ll
leave that person blank, obviously — doesn’t have children. She responded to me,
“What difference does that make?” because this is in court, and the judge who’s on the
bench said, “I think it does make a difference.”

Chris Castellano: Yeah, I think you’re right.

David Bulitt: That, in part, led to a good ruling for my client, but we’ll skip over that. I
want to talk a little bit about the two [00:21:00] specific areas of conflict when it comes to
winter and Christmas break, or any other at least impartial secular break as well. The
first is gift giving.

Isn’t that an area for you and your clients to sort of talk through and make sure that they
and their co-parent communicate about?

Chris Castellano: I think that’s fair. Certainly, in the last 10 or 15 years, it’s become — as
the electronic devices have become more ubiquitous — more of a concern for maybe
one parent that’s a little bit more sensitive to screens, if you will, than the other.
It’s about communicating based on the age of the kids: “Hey, what do we think is
appropriate as far as whether I give this kid a tablet? Do they get the phone, the
smartwatch, or the gaming console, whatever it may be?” I think that’s certainly a valid
discussion. But to be honest with you, David, I’m not going to sit here and say that
parties should communicate on the smaller items, right?

I think on your big item that has some substance, it’s absolutely appropriate to talk and
establish expectations and make sure, especially if it’s an item that’s going to go back
and forth between the houses, that you talk about it. Do you have to talk about what
you’re putting in the stockings? No.

David Bulitt: Let me ask you this, though, because this has come up multiple times for
me, where people are usually divorced and have been divorced for some period of time,
and one parent is now in a different financial circumstance than the other.

So, “Hey, I can afford to get little Christine something expensive,” whatever that might
be — an electric bike, or pick something that costs a lot of money, or “I can afford to
give her many, many gifts.” The other co-parent says, “Well, I can’t do that. So, of
course, the kids are going to want to spend more time at the other parent’s house
because they’re getting thousands of dollars of gifts from that parent. I can’t do that.
That doesn’t seem fair to me, and it puts me in a bad position.”

Is that a discussion that you have had with your clients over the [00:23:00] years? And if
so — and it may be that it may be not. Maybe I’m just longer in the tooth than you — if
so, how do you talk to people about how they can sort of resolve those things? They
can’t tell the other parent, don’t buy this or don’t buy that necessarily. So how do you
advise folks who are in that circumstance, either on both sides of the financial
continuum?

Chris Castellano: Yeah, so I have actually had this exact issue on both sides. There’s a
tendency for the more affluent party to, as you say, shower gifts. Generally speaking,
whether it’s right or wrong, I found that the party that’s more affluent seems to have less
custody time. So, they use that affluence to buy affection.

That’s usually closer to when an agreement is signed as opposed to later. Early on in
the process, they think, “Well, geez, I’m going to just buy each kid their own Xbox or
PlayStation, and they’ll be dying to be in the house with me as [00:24:00] opposed to
the other party.” But crucially, I think it’s an important discussion to, again, understand
the values of the kids, understand the values of the parties, including the values you
tried to instill before you separated.

Those don’t go away just because you and your spouse separated, right? The kids still
have those values. They’re still looking to those values that you tried to foster early on.
So, you don’t want to discard those.

For the spouse that maybe doesn’t have as much means, I’ve talked to and counseled
people about breaking away mentally from the idea that you need to give the kid a
material item. Why don’t you say, “You know what? Your gift this year, what I’m going to
do, is take you somewhere special. This is going to be a special time just for you and me. We’re going to a museum,” let’s say. If money is real tight, there are plenty of free
options that you can go to.

And if maybe instead of buying the device, you want to [00:25:00] spend a couple
hundred bucks and take them on a trip to Manhattan, those experiences, stuff like that,
are what stay with kids. The kid’s mind is, again, forming those memories.

David Bulitt: I think that’s a really great point to make. Our brains don’t develop until
we’re, as my wife has told me, I think, until you’re 24 or 25 years old. So, what
memories do you have from your childhood? Do you remember getting that iPad when
you were nine? Or do you remember when Mom or Dad took me downtown to see
whatever exhibit it might have been, or we got on the train and went up to New York for
the day, and walked around and saw Times Square and saw the tree and some of the
parade?

Those are the things that you remember. I tell parents all the time just what you just
talked about. Think about what you remember from when you were a kid. What do you
remember? Do you remember the gifts that you got? Most people would say, “Eh,
maybe I remember when I got a bike. But I do remember when my dad took me here.
My mom took me [00:26:00] here.” I think that’s a great point to make.
So, what I want to do to wrap things up, Chris, is ask you to bullet point a couple of
really important takeaways for people who are in this circumstance to remember as they
go forward and as they look to plan for future years.

Chris Castellano: Yeah, sure. Perfect. Communication, number one, and it might be
even the most important: communication is key. Communicate with your co-parent.
Make sure that you understand timelines. Make sure you understand expectations and
make sure you’re respecting the other party in your communications.
Number two, honor existing traditions to an appropriate extent. Look to create new
traditions. Look to create new memories for your kids. That is what’s going to help those
kids adapt to this new reality.

Number three, maintain flexibility and cooperation. That is so key to ensuring that your
[00:27:00] children are adapting well and they’re enjoying their holidays. Because the
last thing you want to do is have a flashpoint and end up seeing red and blue flashing
lights outside the house because you just can’t get out of your own way, and you make
it about you and the fight with your ex or your spouse instead of thinking about the kids.
Then you have just made such a damning memory in these kids’ minds. So that is
something you need to avoid at all costs.

David Bulitt: I think those are very helpful. Folks, you should listen to this part again and
take notes. I would add two things to that, just as general type thoughts. One is to assume good intentions, and that is what I mean, assume that your co-parent is — whatever they said, whatever they’re doing — assume that it comes from a good place
and not a place of conflict.

Secondly, particularly this time of year, give some grace to people. Give some grace to
your co-parent. Most importantly, give grace to your children, right? [00:28:00] Put
others’ feelings before your own, particularly those people that you brought into this
planet or adopted from somewhere. Give grace to everyone else and take a moment.
Chris, as always, it’s been a great conversation. Over the last few months, it’s turned
into us becoming co-hosts and just sort of having these great conversations. I really
appreciate you taking the time, and I do want people to hear from you, although it’ll be in
the show notes. How do they get ahold of you, particularly this time of year when
something might — and Thanksgiving is just around the corner, a few days away, but
you have the winter break coming up — how would folks get ahold of you to talk about
this or anything else relative to separation and divorce?

Chris Castellano: Yeah, give me a call at 240-399-7881. You can get me directly
through that number, and we can talk about all your concerns or how you want to
establish new traditions for your kids and whether that’s appropriate. I’m happy to take
the calls.

David Bulitt: Awesome. Thank you, Chris. And as always, thank you, folks, for listening.
[00:29:00] We will be back next time on JGL Law for You.

The Anti-Fraud Coalition (TAF) recently published the article “State False Claims Acts,” which was edited by JGL attorney Gia Grimm. The article provides an overview of the federal False Claims Act (FCA) – a law that empowers private citizens to help recover government funds lost to fraud. With more than $78 billion recovered since 1986, the FCA remains one of the nation’s most effective anti-fraud tools.

Building on this foundation, the article explains how 33 states and territories have enacted their own FCAs, many of which mirror the federal law but include important distinctions. Some states have both general and Medicaid-specific FCAs, while others allow whistleblower actions involving private insurance or even tax fraud. As these statutes expand, they offer additional avenues for recovery and often provide valuable investigatory resources that can strengthen whistleblower cases.

As editor of the piece, Gia Grimm underscores the practical and strategic importance of considering state FCAs whenever public funds are involved. Properly navigating state procedures, coordinating with state officials, and understanding varying statutory requirements can significantly enhance outcomes for whistleblowers. The article highlights how state and federal collaboration can maximize recoveries and ensure comprehensive accountability for fraud affecting public programs.

Read the article “State False Claims Acts” on the TAF Coalition website.

In an article published by Corporate Compliance Insights on November 18, 2025, Gia Grimm and Karan Manohar discuss the Maryland Online Data Privacy Act (MODPA), which is effective as of October 1, 2025, and enforceable beginning April 1, 2026.

MODPA is a comprehensive state privacy law that regulates how businesses collect, process, use and share personal data of Maryland residents. Gia and Karan write that businesses that engage in e-commerce and retailers that collect names, addresses and payment information will need to comply with MODPA, as will subscription services businesses such as streaming platforms that keep consumer login, billing or preference details.

Gia and Karan add that under MODPA, personal data refers to any information that can be “linked or reasonably linked to an identified or identifiable consumer.” Examples of personal data include information relating to an individual’s address, email information or cookie ID.

They go on to explain that the act establishes affirmative rights for consumers, who now have the right to correct inaccuracies within their personal data and can opt out of having their personal data processed and used for targeted advertising.

With failures to comply resulting in fines of up to $10,000 per violation and $25,000 for repeated violations, it’s critical that businesses prepare for the act now, Gia and Karna said. Businesses should first determine if they are governed by MODPA, and if so, establish an implementation plan to comply with MODPA’s requirements before enforcement begins April 1, 2026.

Read the full article “What You Need to Know About Maryland’s New Data Privacy Law.” (PDF)

What does False Claim Act (FCA) enforcement look like nine months into President Donald Trump’s second term? It’s a mixed bag. Some cases the administration is pursuing are tried and true areas of fraud enforcement while others are brand new and still being developed. Some of the priority cases so far from 2025 are summarized below.

For whistleblowers and their counsel, there is some measure of consistency with previous policies and priorities in FCA cases. This includes continued prosecution of health care and cybersecurity fraud, both of which are priorities from past administrations that seem to be holding their places in this new dynamic. Several settlements and verdicts announced so far this year are the classic health care fraud the government has championed for decades – regardless of presidents – like unlawful kickbacks, charging for services not rendered, upcoding, and useless services. These cases are a fairly consistent through-line between administrations, and we are seeing them hold in 2025.

There are also new policies and priorities that differ or break from the past. This administration has made tariffs a focal point of not only international relations policy but also domestically for the Department of Justice. We have seen a flurry of FCA enforcement and settlement activity already involving allegations of failing to pay tariffs or other custom duties. Another new tactic announced by this administration is using the FCA for the first time to go after recipients of federal dollars who have any “illegal diversity, equity, and inclusion” practices, causing uncertainty and apprehension in the government contractor space about what constitutes illegal DEI.

While this article does not discuss every case or policy initiative relating to the FCA, it attempts to provide a snapshot of how FCA cases are faring so far under the new administration, as well as how both whistleblower counsel and the defense bar are litigating hot-button FCA issues in 2025.

Key 2025 Jury Verdicts and Appeals

Relatively speaking, most FCA cases do not get litigated. Most either settle before litigation or are declined by the government and dismissed by relators. However, more and more often whistleblowers and experienced FCA counsel are litigating declined cases and reaping the rewards of these hard-fought battles. Several high-profile jury verdicts made headlines this year, including in cases the government declined.

Is the qui tam provision unconstitutional? In January, several appeal briefs were filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit on both sides of U.S. ex rel Zafirov v. Physician Partners et al., Case No. 8:19CV-01236 (M.D. FL 2024), in which an outlier ruling from a district court in Florida that found the FCA’s qui tam provision to be unconstitutional. In that declined case, the whistleblower alleged that the providers submitted false risk adjustment data to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, resulting in higher reimbursement than was owed. Ending the case before trial, the district court entered judgment on the pleadings in favor of the defense, finding for the first time in over 200 years that the FCA’s qui tam provision is unconstitutional.

That provision is, of course, the unique aspect of the FCA that allows – and in fact encourages – ordinary citizens to file suit on the government’s behalf when they have personal knowledge of fraud. Last year saw the highest number of qui tam actions ever filed, according to the DOJ. This year, defendants are filing motions to dismiss citing Zafirov, though the majority are still denied around the country. The DOJ, the relators’ bar, and friendly parties (including Republican Sen. Charles Grassley) all weighed in to support the qui tam provision. Meanwhile, those arguing that it is unconstitutional include the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Washington Legal Foundation, and several large and influential industry groups, medical providers, and insurers. With heavy-hitting amici lining up on both sides of this issue, anyone interested in the FCA needs to follow this appeal closely as it appears destined for the Supreme Court.

SuperValu ends in a defense win. In March, an Illinois jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant SuperValu after a 14-year battle defending against a whistleblower’s allegations that the grocery store offered discounts to customers for generic drugs that it did not also offer to Medicare and Medicaid, thereby overcharging the government. Before the jury verdict, this case took a detour to the Supreme Court in 2023, which overruled the Seventh Circuit and confirmed that whether a defendant has scienter sufficient for FCA liability depends on the defendant’s subjective knowledge. While that opinion was a victory for whistleblowers and the FCA, the SuperValu whistleblower’s tortured saga ultimately ended in a defense verdict.

Omnicare faces trebling and penalties. In April, a unanimous jury in New York returned a verdict against Omnicare, the nation’s largest long-term care pharmacy, and parent CVS Health Corporation in one of the largest damages verdicts ever returned by a jury in a FCA case. After a month-long trial, the civil jury found that Omnicare billed the government for over 3 million false claims, resulting in $135,592,814 in damages. Under the FCA, the government is entitled to three times that amount plus statutory penalties to be determined by the court.

Janssen seeks relief from billion-dollar judgment. In July, Janssen Pharmaceuticals appealed a $1.6 billion judgment from a federal court in New Jersey. After a six-week trial prosecuted by a whistleblower after the government declined to intervene, the jury had returned a verdict finding that Janssen submitted 159,574 false claims and awarding $120 million in damages. The district court upheld the award and added $360 million in treble damages plus $8,000 per claim, amounting to an eye-popping $1.63 billion judgment. Janssen’s appeal to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals claims that the judgment is excessive and, echoing Zafirov, the qui tam provision of the FCA is unconstitutional. The appeal is now pending.

CVS Caremark tagged with $289 million judgment. In August, a federal court in Pennsylvania assessed post-trial damages after a $95 million verdict against CVS Caremark Corporation. The case was brought by a whistleblower who proved that Caremark knowingly caused certain Medicare Part D sponsors to misrepresent to the government the amount that Part D beneficiaries paid for prescription drugs at Walgreens and Rite Aid in 2013 and 2014. After applying statutory treble damages and civil penalties, the court entered final judgment for $289,873,500.

Jury hands Eli Lilly $183 million judgment. In September, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a jury verdict of $61.23 million against Eli Lilly that was increased to $183.7 million after statutory trebling under the FCA. The appeals court concluded the jury had reasonably found that the company knowingly concealed having retroactively increased its prices on some drugs and thereafter failed to rebate Medicaid on the higher prices. Though it upheld the verdict, the court rejected the whistleblower’s argument that the judgment should have been higher because the trial court miscounted the number of FCA violations.

Settlements

FCA settlements are far more common than jury verdicts. This year has shown no sign of slowing down as several significant settlements were published.

Health care fraud

Health care fraud cases continue their prominence in FCA enforcement matters. In June, the United States announced the largest national health care fraud takedown ever, involving of 324 defendants charged with over $14.6 billion in alleged fraud. This historic takedown involved various allegations, including fraudulent wound care, prescription opioid trafficking, telemedicine fraud, fraudulent genetic testing, kickbacks and bribes, and services that were not delivered as billed.

Other large health care fraud settlements announced so far in 2025 include the following, with many involving unlawful kickbacks:

  • A $17 million settlement with a group of medical supply companies to resolve whistleblower allegations of kickback-related fraud that involved providing free samples and discounts to encourage urology practice groups to use the defendants’ prescription form for prescribing catheters. As typical in kickback cases, DOJ warned of the “use of inducements to influence a physician’s medical decisions” as a risk to the physician-patient relationship.
  • A $59.7 million settlement arising from whistleblower allegations that Pfizer gave health care providers kickback payments to encourage them to prescribe the migraine medication Nurtec ODT.
  • A $29 million settlement stemming from a whistleblower suit against a New York hospital to resolve allegations that it knowingly retained erroneously received payment from the Department of Defense for services provided to retired military members and their families. This case represents a “reverse false claim,” which alleges that a company mistakenly received federal funds and identified the overpayment but nevertheless retained the funds without disclosing and returning them to the government.
  • A $62 million settlement to resolve whistleblower allegations that a Medicare Advantage provider and its former president violated the FCA by causing the submission of false diagnostic codes for spinal conditions that its patients did not actually have in order to increase Medicare Advantage ( Medicare Part C) payments.
  • A $350 million settlement with Walgreens related to whistleblower allegations that the pharmacy filled illegal opioid prescriptions.
  • A $202 million settlement with Gilead Sciences stemming from whistleblower allegations that it paid kickbacks to doctors to induce them to prescribe Gilead’s HIV drugs. Uniquely, Gilead admitted to certain allegations, including paying for speaking fees, lavish dinner programs, and all-expense-paid trips.
  • A $31.5 million settlement initiated by a whistleblower against a health system for allegedly paying kickbacks to physicians in the form of extravagant benefits to induce patient referrals. This settlement resolved allegations of violations of both the Anti-Kickback Statute and the Stark Law.
  • A $9.2 million settlement stemming from three separate whistleblower lawsuits alleging that a hospice provider paid illegal kickbacks to medical directors, including monthly stipends and signing bonuses, to induce them to refer patients.
  • A $18.5 million settlement involving a substance abuse treatment facility that allegedly compensated Medicaid patients for seeking addiction treatment in violation of the federal AntiKickback Statute and FCA.
  • A $37 million settlement to resolve whistleblower allegations that a device company and its distributor falsely claimed that their devices were reimbursable by Medicare and marketed them as such, knowing they were not covered. The device company also entered into a five-year Corporate Integrity Agreement with HHS-OIG, requiring ongoing monitoring by the government and reporting by the device company.

Cybersecurity

In 2021, DOJ announced a Civil Cyber-Fraud Initiative that would use the FCA to pursue government contractors and grant recipients who allegedly committed cybersecurity-related fraud. Since then, cybersecurity cases have been on the rise, getting the attention of DOJ and cyber companies alike. So far in 2025, DOJ has announced at least three cyber case settlements that are sure to pave the way for more cases in the future. Notably, while most – if not all – of these cases involve government contracts, they are not necessarily breach of contract matters but instead focus on alleged violations of Defense Federal Acquisition Regulations.

The first settlement, announced in May, involved an agreement by Raytheon, RTX Corporation, and Nightwing Group to pay $8.4 million to resolve allegations of noncompliance with cybersecurity requirements in federal contracts with the Department of Defense – specifically, that Raytheon used its noncompliant internal systems to develop, use, and store unclassified defense information.

The second involved Illumina Inc., which agreed to pay $9.8 million to resolve FCA allegations arising from cybersecurity vulnerabilities in genomic sequencing systems. Illumina stood accused of selling systems to the government that had inadequate security programs and insufficient quality systems. In its press release, the government noted that, “HHS-OIG and our law enforcement partners remain dedicated to ensuring that entities who do business with the government uphold their cybersecurity obligations.” Illumina’s former director for platform management was the whistleblower and received a $1.9 million relator share in the settlement.

Though a smaller settlement, the defense contractor Aero Turbine and private equity company Gallant Capital Partners agreed to pay $1.75 million to resolve allegations that they knowingly failed to comply with cybersecurity requirements in a contract with the Air Force. This settlement was fairly novel in that it did not stem from a whistleblower but appeared to be a result of Aero Turbine and Gallant’s cooperation, for which they received significant credit. This settlement also marked a rather rare instance of an FCA settlement against a private equity firm in addition to the contracting firm.

In August 2024, DOJ forged new ground with its first intervention in a cybersecurity FCA case against the Georgia Tech Research Corporation and related parties for work performed at the Georgia Institute of Technology. The government alleged that the defendants failed to meet cybersecurity requirements in connection with certain Air Force and Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency contracts. This included allegations of missing or antiquated antivirus and antimalware programs and the absence of a security plan. On September 30, 2025, DOJ announced a settlement of $875,000 to resolve these allegations.

Customs and Tariffs

DOJ announced a new Trade Fraud Task Force in August, bringing together its civil and criminal divisions and the Department of Homeland Security to pursue actions against parties who evade tariffs and duties and engage in smuggling. Before the announcement, DOJ had already settled at least four customs and tariffs cases during the first part of the year, including:

  • An $8.1 million settlement brought by a whistleblower against an importer of multilayered wood flooring that allegedly evaded customs duties on imports from China.
  • A $6.8 million settlement with an importer of plastic resin who voluntarily disclosed that it had failed to pay customs duties on products from China.
  • A $4.9 million settlement brought by a whistleblower against a patio furniture company accused of violating the FCA by evading antidumping and countervailing duties on items made of extruded aluminum originating in China.
  • A $12.4 million settlement brought by a whistleblower against a supplier of countertop and cabinetry products and its president to resolve allegations of evading antidumping and countervailing duties owed to the government on quartz surface products imported from China.

As a key priority for this administration, more customs and tariff settlements are expected in the remainder of this year, next year, and beyond.

Initiatives

In May, DOJ announced the establishment of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative, which will use the FCA to eliminate so-called “illegal DEI” programs. This initiative seeks to use the FCA to investigate and prosecute recipients of federal money who knowingly violate federal civil rights laws, defined by this administration as antisemitism and “inherently divisive policies like DEI.” This is an unprecedented effort to use the FCA to enforce an administration’s interpretation of federal civil rights laws and one that has FCA, employment, and government contract practitioners seeking clarity and guidance. It follows Executive Orders 14151 and 14173, repealing previous decades-old executive orders that promoted antidiscrimination policies and encouraged DEI programs. Several entities voluntarily discarded or scaled back their DEI programs in immediate reaction to these orders. To date, no settlements have been announced under this new rubric, but this is certainly one to watch unfold in 2026.

In July, DOJ announced a new working group to combat health care fraud, largely using the power of the FCA. As has been typical of any new administration, this working group announced its top health care enforcement priorities:

  • Medicare Advantage.
  • Drug, device, or biologics pricing, including discounts.
  • Barriers to patient access to care.
  • Kickbacks.
  • Materially defective medical devices that impact patient safety.
  • Manipulation of electronic health records systems to drive inappropriate utilization of Medicare products and services.

Several of these areas, like kickbacks, have been a priority enforcement area for government attorneys for decades. This initiative touts interagency coordination in these enforcement efforts and also strongly encourages relators with knowledge of fraud to identify and report it. With this initiative, we can expect DOJ’s annual enforcement numbers to skew toward health care cases as they almost always do.

Key Takeaways

This administration so far appears to support the FCA and its qui tam provision. In the few months remaining this year and into 2026, we are certain to see more settlements in FCA cases, including in the health care, cybersecurity, customs and tariffs, and public-private partnership spaces, among others. There are no signs that any of these cases or administration priorities will ease up any time soon.

At the same time, however, we continue to see more FCA cases being litigated, including those prosecuted by whistleblowers without government intervention, and tried to verdict and appeal. It appears that both sides of the “V” in these cases are more willing to try their luck in front of a jury than was typically seen in previous decades. With these trial verdicts and appeals, we would hope to get some finality regarding familiar defense arguments that the FCA’s statutory damage and penalties are excessive under the Eighth Amendment and that the qui tam provision of the FCA is unconstitutional. A handful of cases that take up these questions are on appeal right now, and we will continue to watch for developments, including a possible Supreme Court showdown over the constitutionality of the qui tam provision.

Download the False Claims Act 2025 Update (PDF)

JGL was a Table Sponsor at the J. Franklyn Bourne Bar Association’s Annual Banquet “Guardians of Justice: Investing in Tomorrow,” which took place at the University of Maryland College Park on November 7, 2025.

For more than forty years, the annual banquet has supported deserving students and makes a difference in the lives of future African American lawyers and the communities they serve.

JGL attorneys Paul F. Riekhof, Timothy Maloney, Renee Blocker, Jonte M. Hunter, Reed Spellman and law clerk Mathew Seeburger attended.

Veronica Nannis, principal in the firm’s False Claims Act and Civil Litigation departments, moderated the session “Litigating False Claims Act Cases” at the Taxpayers Against Fraud (TAF) Coalition’s 25th Annual Conference, held November 5–7, 2025, in Washington, DC.

Nannis Jay Fischer Whistelblower Panel
left to right: Jay Holland, JGL Principal; Tom Fischer, former CFO and Chief Operating Officer of Community Health Network; and Veronica Nannis, JGL Principal

As a member of the TAF Coalition Conference Committee, Veronica helped shape this year’s program and moderated a dynamic discussion on the evolving landscape of False Claims Act (FCA) litigation. Panelists shared practical strategies for handling discovery disputes, motion practice, and complex factual records—core issues for both experienced and emerging FCA litigators.

JGL principal Jay Holland, chair of the firm’s Labor, Employment, and Qui Tam Whistleblower practice attended the event.